↓ Skip to main content

The effect of NCMS on catastrophic health expenditure and impoverishment from tuberculosis care in China

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of NCMS on catastrophic health expenditure and impoverishment from tuberculosis care in China
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, October 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12939-016-0463-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chengchao Zhou, Qian Long, Jiaying Chen, Li Xiang, Qiang Li, Shenglan Tang, Fei Huang, Qiang Sun, Henry Lucas, Shitong Huan

Abstract

Health expenditure for tuberculosis (TB) care often pushes households into catastrophe and poverty. New Cooperative Medical Scheme (NCMS) aims to protect households from catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) and impoverishment in rural China. This article assesses the effect of NCMS on relieving CHE and impoverishment from TB care in rural China. Three hundred fourty-seven TB cases are included in the analysis. We analyze the incidence and intensity of CHE and poverty, and assess the protective effect of NCMS by comparing the CHE and impoverishment before and after reimbursement. After out-of-pocket (OOP) payment for TB care, 16.1 % of non-poor fall below poverty line. The NCMS reduces the incidence of CHE and impoverishment by 11.5 % and 7.3 %. After reimbursement, 46.7 % of the households still experience CHE and 35.4 % are below the poverty line. The NCMS relieves the mean gap, mean positive gap, poverty gap and normalized positive gap by 44.5 %, 51.0 %, US$115.8 and 31.6 % respectively. The NCMS has partial effect on protecting households from CHE and impoverishment from TB care. The limited protection could be enhanced by redesigning benefit coverage to improve the "height" of the NCMS and representing fee-for-service with alternative payment mechanisms.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 22%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 5 6%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 21 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 16%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 22 27%