You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multilevel challenges to engagement in HIV care after prison release: a theory-informed qualitative study comparing prisoners’ perspectives before and after community reentry
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1253 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Danielle F Haley, Carol E Golin, Claire E Farel, David A Wohl, Anna M Scheyett, Jenna J Garrett, David L Rosen, Sharon D Parker |
| Abstract |
Although prison provides the opportunity for HIV diagnosis and access to in-prison care, following release, many HIV-infected inmates experience clinical setbacks, including nonadherence to antiretrovirals, elevations in viral load, and HIV disease progression. HIV-infected former inmates face numerous barriers to successful community reentry and to accessing healthcare. However, little is known about the outcome expectations of HIV-infected inmates for release, how their post-release lives align with pre-release expectations, and how these processes influence engagement in HIV care following release from prison. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 212 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 38 | 18% |
| Researcher | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 15% |
| Unknown | 60 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 39 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 13% |
| Psychology | 19 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 68 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2015.
All research outputs
#14,206,722
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,316
of 14,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,589
of 361,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#143
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,843 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.