↓ Skip to main content

Conditional cash transfer schemes in Nigeria: potential gains for maternal and child health service uptake in a national pilot programme

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
243 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conditional cash transfer schemes in Nigeria: potential gains for maternal and child health service uptake in a national pilot programme
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12884-014-0408-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ugo Okoli, Laura Morris, Adetokunbo Oshin, Muhammad A Pate, Chidimma Aigbe, Ado Muhammad

Abstract

BackgroundThis paper describes use of a Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT) programme to encourage use of critical MNCH services among rural women in Nigeria.MethodsThe CCT programme was first implemented as a pilot in 37 primary health care facilities (PHCs), in nine Nigerian states. The programme entitles women using these facilities up to N5,000 (approximately US$30) if they attend antenatal care (ANC), skilled delivery, and postnatal care. There are 88 other PHCs from these nine states included in this study, which implemented a standard package of supply upgrades without the CCT. Data on monthly service uptake throughout the continuum of care was collected at 124 facilities during quarterly monitoring visits. An interrupted time series using segmented linear regression was applied to estimate separately the effects of the CCT programme and supply package on service uptake.ResultsFrom April 2013-March 2014, 20,133 women enrolled in the CCT. Sixty-four percent of beneficiaries returned at least once after registration, and 80% of women delivering with skilled attendance returned after delivery. The CCT intervention is associated with a statistically significant increase in the monthly number of women attending four or more ANC visits (increase of 15.12 visits per 100,000 catchment population, p¿<¿0.01; 95% confidence interval 7.38 to 22.85), despite a negative level effect immediately after the intervention began (¿45.53/100,000 catchment population; p¿<¿0.05; 95% CI ¿82.71 to ¿8.36). A statistically significant increase was also observed in the monthly number of women receiving two or more Tetanus toxoid doses during pregnancy (21.65/100,000 catchment population; p¿<¿0.01; 95% CI 9.23 to 34.08). Changes for other outcomes with the CCT intervention (number of women attending first ANC visit; number of deliveries with skilled attendance; number of neonates receiving OPV at birth) were not found to be statistically significant.ConclusionsThe results show that the CCT intervention is capable of significant effects on service uptake, although results for several outcomes of interest were inconclusive. Key lessons learnt from the pilot phase of implementation include a need to track beneficiary retention throughout the continuum of care as closely as possible, and avert loss to follow-up.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 240 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 19%
Researcher 39 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 9%
Student > Postgraduate 16 7%
Student > Bachelor 15 6%
Other 38 16%
Unknown 65 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 23%
Social Sciences 39 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 29 12%
Unknown 76 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,327,232
of 25,822,778 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#281
of 4,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,965
of 365,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#1
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,822,778 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.