↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of low central venous oxygen saturation in the first hours of intensive care unit admission and associated mortality in septic shock patients: a prospective multicentre study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence of low central venous oxygen saturation in the first hours of intensive care unit admission and associated mortality in septic shock patients: a prospective multicentre study
Published in
Critical Care, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13054-014-0609-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thierry Boulain, Denis Garot, Philippe Vignon, Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou, Arnaud Desachy, Vlad Botoc, Arnaud Follin, Jean-Pierre Frat, Frédéric Bellec, Jean-Pierre Quenot, Armelle Mathonnet, Pierre-François Dequin, for the Clinical Research in Intensive Care and Sepsis Group

Abstract

In septic shock patients, the prevalence of low (<70%) central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) on admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and its relationship to outcome are unknown. The objectives of the present study were to estimate the prevalence of low ScvO2 in the first hours of ICU admission and to assess its potential association with mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 99 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Postgraduate 13 13%
Student > Master 11 11%
Other 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Other 26 26%
Unknown 20 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Engineering 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 23 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#4,835,823
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,282
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,780
of 276,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#66
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.