You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Change in emotion regulation during the course of treatment predicts binge abstinence in guided self-help dialectical behavior therapy for binge eating disorder
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Eating Disorders, December 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40337-014-0035-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Laurel M Wallace, Philip C Masson, Debra L Safer, Kristin M von Ranson |
Abstract |
Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), which appears to be an effective treatment for binge eating disorder (BED), focuses on teaching emotion regulation skills. However, the role of improved emotion regulation in predicting treatment outcome in BED is uncertain. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 83% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 96 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 19% |
Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
Researcher | 12 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
Other | 19 | 20% |
Unknown | 16 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 53 | 55% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Unknown | 21 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2015.
All research outputs
#6,062,882
of 22,774,233 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Eating Disorders
#424
of 791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,001
of 361,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Eating Disorders
#6
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,774,233 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.