↓ Skip to main content

Barriers and facilitating factors related to use of early warning score among acute care nurses: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Emergency Medicine, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Barriers and facilitating factors related to use of early warning score among acute care nurses: a qualitative study
Published in
BMC Emergency Medicine, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12873-017-0147-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Asger Petersen, Lars S. Rasmussen, Susan Rydahl-Hansen

Abstract

The early warning score (EWS) was developed to identify deteriorating patients early. It is a track-and-trigger system based on vital signs designed to direct appropriate clinical responses based on the seriousness and nature of the underlying condition. Despite its wide dissemination, serious adverse events still occur, often due to failure among staff on general wards to follow the EWS protocol. The purpose of the study was to determine barriers and facilitating factors related to three aspects of the EWS protocol: 1) adherence to monitoring frequency, 2) call for junior doctors to patients with an elevated EWS, and 3) call for the medical emergency team. Focus groups were conducted with nurses from medical and surgical acute care wards, and content analysis was used to identify barriers and facilitating factors in relation to the research questions. Adherence to monitoring frequency would frequently be set aside during busy periods for other tasks. Collaboration and communication with doctors about medical patients with elevated EWS was considered to be unrealistic due to the high number of patients with these scores. Collaboration with the medical emergency team was problematic, since many nurses found the team to have negative attitudes. EWS reduces complex clinical conditions to a single number, with the inherent risk to overlook clinical cues and subtle changes in patients' condition. The study showed that identifying and treating deteriorating patients is a collaborative task that requires diverse technical and non-technical skills for staff to perform optimally.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 163 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 16%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 8%
Researcher 10 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 62 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 47 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 20%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 68 42%