↓ Skip to main content

PERFECTED enhanced recovery (PERFECT-ER) care versus standard acute care for patients admitted to acute settings with hip fracture identified as experiencing confusion: study protocol for a…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PERFECTED enhanced recovery (PERFECT-ER) care versus standard acute care for patients admitted to acute settings with hip fracture identified as experiencing confusion: study protocol for a feasibility cluster randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13063-017-2303-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon P. Hammond, Jane L. Cross, Lee Shepstone, Tamara Backhouse, Catherine Henderson, Fiona Poland, Erika Sims, Alasdair MacLullich, Bridget Penhale, Robert Howard, Nigel Lambert, Anna Varley, Toby O. Smith, Opinder Sahota, Simon Donell, Martyn Patel, Clive Ballard, John Young, Martin Knapp, Stephen Jackson, Justin Waring, Nick Leavey, Gregory Howard, Chris Fox

Abstract

Health and social care provision for an ageing population is a global priority. Provision for those with dementia and hip fracture has specific and growing importance. Older people who break their hip are recognised as exceptionally vulnerable to experiencing confusion (including but not exclusively, dementia and/or delirium and/or cognitive impairment(s)) before, during or after acute admissions. Older people experiencing hip fracture and confusion risk serious complications, linked to delayed recovery and higher mortality post-operatively. Specific care pathways acknowledging the differences in patient presentation and care needs are proposed to improve clinical and process outcomes. This protocol describes a multi-centre, feasibility, cluster-randomised, controlled trial (CRCT) to be undertaken across ten National Health Service hospital trusts in the UK. The trial will explore the feasibility of undertaking a CRCT comparing the multicomponent PERFECTED enhanced recovery intervention (PERFECT-ER), which acknowledges the differences in care needs of confused older patients experiencing hip fracture, with standard care. The trial will also have an integrated process evaluation to explore how PERFECT-ER is implemented and interacts with the local context. The study will recruit 400 hip fracture patients identified as experiencing confusion and will also recruit "suitable informants" (individuals in regular contact with participants who will complete proxy measures). We will also recruit NHS professionals for the process evaluation. This mixed methods design will produce data to inform a definitive evaluation of the intervention via a large-scale pragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT). The trial will provide a preliminary estimate of potential efficacy of PERFECT-ER versus standard care; assess service delivery variation, inform primary and secondary outcome selection, generate estimates of recruitment and retention rates, data collection difficulties, and completeness of outcome data and provide an indication of potential economic benefits. The process evaluation will enhance knowledge of implementation delivery and receipt. ISRCTN, 99336264 . Registered on 5 September 2016.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 133 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 16%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 46 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 10%
Psychology 8 6%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 47 35%