↓ Skip to main content

Development and evaluation of an innovative model of inter-professional education focused on asthma medication use

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and evaluation of an innovative model of inter-professional education focused on asthma medication use
Published in
BMC Medical Education, April 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-14-72
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sinthia Z Bosnic-Anticevich, Meg Stuart, Judith Mackson, Biljana Cvetkovski, Erica Sainsbury, Carol Armour, Sofia Mavritsakis, Gosia Mendrela, Pippa Travers-Mason, Margaret Williamson

Abstract

Inter-professional learning has been promoted as the solution to many clinical management issues. One such issue is the correct use of asthma inhaler devices. Up to 80% of people with asthma use their inhaler device incorrectly. The implications of this are poor asthma control and quality of life. Correct inhaler technique can be taught, however these educational instructions need to be repeated if correct technique is to be maintained. It is important to maximise the opportunities to deliver this education in primary care. In light of this, it is important to explore how health care providers, in particular pharmacists and general medical practitioners, can work together in delivering inhaler technique education to patients, over time. Therefore, there is a need to develop and evaluate effective inter-professional education, which will address the need to educate patients in the correct use of their inhalers as well as equip health care professionals with skills to engage in collaborative relationships with each other.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 152 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Master 16 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 37 24%
Unknown 42 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 14%
Social Sciences 12 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 6%
Psychology 7 5%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 47 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2022.
All research outputs
#14,466,797
of 23,179,757 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,004
of 3,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,184
of 228,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#43
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,179,757 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.