You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exploring intensive care nurses’ team performance in a simulation-based emergency situation, − expert raters’ assessments versus self-assessments: an explorative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Nursing, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12912-014-0047-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Randi Ballangrud, Mona Persenius, Birgitta Hedelin, Marie Louise Hall-Lord |
| Abstract |
Effective teamwork has proven to be crucial for providing safe care. The performance of emergencies in general and cardiac arrest situations in particular, has been criticized for primarily focusing on the individual's technical skills and too little on the teams' performance of non-technical skills. The aim of the study was to explore intensive care nurses' team performance in a simulation-based emergency situation by using expert raters' assessments and nurses' self-assessments in relation to different intensive care specialties. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 129 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
| Researcher | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 26% |
| Unknown | 31 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 19% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 31 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2018.
All research outputs
#8,034,837
of 24,153,435 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nursing
#284
of 837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,311
of 339,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nursing
#8
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,153,435 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.