You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Alteration in global motor strategy following lateral ankle sprain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-15-436 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maude Bastien, Hélène Moffet, Laurent J Bouyer, Marc Perron, Luc J Hébert, Jean Leblond |
| Abstract |
Lateral ankle sprain (LAS) has often been considered an injury leading to localized joint impairments affecting the musculoskeletal system. Persistent chronic ankle instability and bilateral alterations in motor control after a first ankle sprain episode suggest that the origin of relapses might be a maladaptive reorganization of central motor commands. The objectives of this study were (1) to compare the quality of motor control through motor strategy variables of two groups (with and without LAS) from a military population (n = 10/group), (2) to evaluate the contribution of the lower limbs and the trunk to global body strategy and (3) to identify which global variable best estimates performance on the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) for each group, reaching direction, and lower limb. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 44% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 33% |
| Spain | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 128 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 19% |
| Unknown | 23 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 25% |
| Sports and Recreations | 12 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 27 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2015.
All research outputs
#4,090,967
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#804
of 4,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,844
of 354,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#14
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,039 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.