↓ Skip to main content

Fibroblast growth factor 23 in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a biomarker substudy of the Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock II (IABP-SHOCK II) trial

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fibroblast growth factor 23 in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a biomarker substudy of the Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock II (IABP-SHOCK II) trial
Published in
Critical Care, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13054-014-0713-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Georg Fuernau, Janine Pöss, Daniel Denks, Steffen Desch, Gunnar H Heine, Ingo Eitel, Sarah Seiler, Suzanne de Waha, Sebastian Ewen, Andreas Link, Gerhard Schuler, Volker Adams, Michael Böhm, Holger Thiele

Abstract

IntroductionCardiogenic shock (CS) is the leading cause of death in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Biomarkers might help in risk stratification and understanding of pathophysiology. Preliminary data suggests that patients with CS face a profound increase in the osteocyte-derived hormone fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23), which acts as a negative regulator of serum phosphate levels. The present study aimed to assess the predictive role of FGF-23 for clinical outcome in a large cohort of CS patients with and without renal dysfunction.MethodsIn the randomized intra-aortic balloon pump in cardiogenic shock II (IABP-SHOCK II)-trial, 600 patients with CS complicating AMI were assigned to therapy with or without IABP. Our predefined biomarker substudy included 182 patients. Blood sampling was performed in a standardized procedure at three different time points (day 1 (day of admission), day 2 and day 3). Differences in outcome of patients with FGF-23 levels¿<¿and¿>¿median were compared by log-rank-testing. Stepwise logistic regression modeling was performed to identify predictors of death at 30 days and Cox-regression analysis for time to death during the first year.ResultsAt all three time points, non-survivors had significantly higher FGF-23 levels compared to survivors (P <0.001 for all). Patients with FGF-23 levels above the median (395 RU/mL [interquartile range 102;2395]) were characterized by an increased 30-day mortality and 1-year mortality. In multivariable analysis FGF-23 levels remained independent predictors for 30-day (odds ratio per 10log 1.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11 to 2.92; P = 0.02) and 1-year mortality (hazard ratio 1.50, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.04, P = 0.009). After stratifying the patients according to their baseline serum creatinine levels, the negative prognostic association of increased FGF-23 was only significant in those with serum creatinine greater than median.ConclusionIn CS, high levels of FGF-23 are independently related to a poor clinical outcome. However, this prognostic association appears only to apply in patients with impaired renal function.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00491036. Registered 22 June 2007.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 72 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 16%
Other 10 14%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Lecturer 4 5%
Other 18 24%
Unknown 16 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 22 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2015.
All research outputs
#14,914,476
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,912
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,567
of 360,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#84
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.