↓ Skip to main content

Regulator of oligodendrocyte maturation, miR-219, a potential biomarker for MS

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroinflammation, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Regulator of oligodendrocyte maturation, miR-219, a potential biomarker for MS
Published in
Journal of Neuroinflammation, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12974-017-1006-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ilona B. Bruinsma, Marie van Dijk, Claire Bridel, Timothy van de Lisdonk, Sanne Q. Haverkort, Tessel F. Runia, Lawrence Steinman, Rogier Q. Hintzen, Joep Killestein, Marcel M. Verbeek, Charlotte E. Teunissen, Brigit A. de Jong

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a demyelinating and degenerative disease of the central nervous system. Normally, demyelination is followed by remyelination, which requires repopulation of a demyelinated area by oligodendrocyte precursor cells. Although large numbers of precursor cells are present in MS lesions, remyelination often fails, in part by the inability of precursor cells to differentiate into mature myelin-forming cells. In mouse and rat, miR-219 is required for this differentiation. Previously, we identified decreased miR-219 expression in tissue of MS patients compared to controls. Cell-free miRNAs have been detected in many different body fluids including cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and may reflect disease processes going on in the central nervous system. This prompted us to investigate the biomarker performance of CSF miR-219 for MS diagnosis. Quantitative PCR was performed measuring miR-219 levels in CSF of MS patients and controls in three independent cohorts. All three cohorts of MS patients and controls revealed that absence of miR-219 detection in CSF is consistently associated with MS. We have been able to identify and validate absence of miR-219 detection in CSF of MS patients compared to controls, suggesting that it may emerge as a candidate biomarker for MS diagnosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Student > Master 8 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 8 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 12 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 10 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2017.
All research outputs
#18,577,751
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#2,083
of 2,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#326,994
of 439,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#40
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.