You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How needs and preferences of employees influence participation in health promotion programs: a six-month follow-up study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1277 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne Rongen, Suzan J W Robroek, Wouter van Ginkel, Dennis Lindeboom, Martin Pet, Alex Burdorf |
| Abstract |
Low participation in health promotion programs (HPPs) might hamper their effectiveness. A potential reason for low participation is disagreement between needs and preferences of potential participants and the actual HPPs offered. This study aimed to investigate employees' need and preferences for HPPs, whether these are matched by what their employers provide, and whether a higher agreement enhanced participation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 130 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
| Researcher | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 21% |
| Unknown | 30 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 17% |
| Psychology | 11 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 35 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2014.
All research outputs
#20,247,117
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#13,873
of 14,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#297,059
of 354,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#186
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,843 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.