↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: weight management interventions in adults with intellectual disabilities and obesity: a systematic review of the evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: weight management interventions in adults with intellectual disabilities and obesity: a systematic review of the evidence
Published in
Nutrition Journal, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-13-123
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dimitrios Spanos, Craig Andrew Melville, Catherine Ruth Hankey

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Postgraduate 4 17%
Other 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 8 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 13%
Psychology 3 13%
Sports and Recreations 2 8%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2015.
All research outputs
#14,926,241
of 23,168,000 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#1,129
of 1,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,619
of 354,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#32
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,168,000 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.6. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.