↓ Skip to main content

Once upon a time the cell membranes: 175 years of cell boundary research

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Direct, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
470 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Once upon a time the cell membranes: 175 years of cell boundary research
Published in
Biology Direct, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13062-014-0032-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan Lombard

Abstract

All modern cells are bounded by cell membranes best described by the fluid mosaic model. This statement is so widely accepted by biologists that little attention is generally given to the theoretical importance of cell membranes in describing the cell. This has not always been the case. When the Cell Theory was first formulated in the XIXth century, almost nothing was known about the cell membranes. It was not until well into the XXth century that the existence of the plasma membrane was broadly accepted and, even then, the fluid mosaic model did not prevail until the 1970s. How were the cell boundaries considered between the articulation of the Cell Theory around 1839 and the formulation of the fluid mosaic model that has described the cell membranes since 1972? In this review I will summarize the major historical discoveries and theories that tackled the existence and structure of membranes and I will analyze how these theories impacted the understanding of the cell. Apart from its purely historical relevance, this account can provide a starting point for considering the theoretical significance of membranes to the definition of the cell and could have implications for research on early life.ReviewersThis article was reviewed by Dr. Étienne Joly, Dr. Eugene V. Koonin and Dr. Armen Mulkidjanian.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 470 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 462 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 103 22%
Student > Bachelor 77 16%
Student > Master 60 13%
Researcher 37 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 3%
Other 55 12%
Unknown 123 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 104 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 70 15%
Chemistry 44 9%
Engineering 16 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 3%
Other 76 16%
Unknown 146 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2023.
All research outputs
#5,432,700
of 25,470,300 outputs
Outputs from Biology Direct
#190
of 537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,673
of 360,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Direct
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,470,300 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,599 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.