↓ Skip to main content

Distinct gene signatures in aortic tissue from ApoE-/-mice exposed to pathogens or Western diet

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Distinct gene signatures in aortic tissue from ApoE-/-mice exposed to pathogens or Western diet
Published in
BMC Genomics, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1176
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carolyn D Kramer, Ellen O Weinberg, Adam C Gower, Xianbao He, Samrawit Mekasha, Connie Slocum, Lea M Beaulieu, Lee Wetzler, Yuriy Alekseyev, Frank C Gibson, Jane E Freedman, Robin R Ingalls, Caroline A Genco

Abstract

Atherosclerosis is a progressive disease characterized by inflammation and accumulation of lipids in vascular tissue. Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg) and Chlamydia pneumoniae (Cp) are associated with inflammatory atherosclerosis in humans. Similar to endogenous mediators arising from excessive dietary lipids, these Gram-negative pathogens are pro-atherogenic in animal models, although the specific inflammatory/atherogenic pathways induced by these stimuli are not well defined. In this study, we identified gene expression profiles that characterize P. gingivalis, C. pneumoniae, and Western diet (WD) at acute and chronic time points in aortas of Apolipoprotein E (ApoE-/-) mice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Researcher 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 6 27%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 3 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2015.
All research outputs
#1,765,614
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#446
of 10,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,111
of 353,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#10
of 251 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,642 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 251 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.