↓ Skip to main content

Proton pump inhibitors increase the risk for hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile infection in critically ill patients

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
22 X users
facebook
11 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Proton pump inhibitors increase the risk for hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile infection in critically ill patients
Published in
Critical Care, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13054-014-0714-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey F Barletta, David A Sclar

Abstract

IntroductionProton pump inhibitors (PPI) have been linked to Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) but there are few data specific to ICU patients. We evaluated duration of PPI exposure as a potential risk factor for hospital-acquired CDI in the ICU.MethodsThis retrospective, case control study was conducted using the Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care II database, a large publically available database of more than 35,000 ICU patients. Adult patients with CDI were identified using the ICD-9 code for Clostridium difficile listed as a secondary diagnosis. To be included, patients had to be present in an ICU for ¿48 hours prior to Clostridium difficile acquisition. These patients were then matched to patients without CDI using the ICD-9 primary diagnosis, age (+/¿5 years) and SOFA score (+/¿1). Successfully matched patients were reviewed for PPI exposure and other potential confounding variables for CDI. PPI exposure was characterized as short (<2 days) or long (¿2 days). Multivariate modeling was performed to identify independent risk factors for CDI.ResultsThere were 408 patients evaluated and 81% received a PPI. The percentage of patients who had a long exposure to PPIs was 83% in the CDI group compared to 73% with controls (P¿=¿0.012). Upon inclusion of the following variables into a multivariate analysis (long PPI exposure, histamine-2-receptor antagonist administration, antibiotic administration, immunosuppression and study duration), long PPI exposure (odds ratio (OR) (95% confidence interval (CI))¿=¿2.03 (1.23 to 3.36), P¿=¿.006) and antibiotic use (OR (95% CI)¿=¿2.52 (1.23 to 5.18), P¿=¿.012) were identified as independent predictors of CDI.ConclusionsProton pump inhibitors are independent risk factors for the development of CDI in ICU patients. This risk is particularly exposed after two or more days of therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 83 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 13%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 22 25%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 52%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 23 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2017.
All research outputs
#1,580,360
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,389
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,867
of 359,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#12
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.