↓ Skip to main content

Validity and reliability of OIDP and OHIP-14: a survey of Chinese high school students

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Oral Health, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validity and reliability of OIDP and OHIP-14: a survey of Chinese high school students
Published in
BMC Oral Health, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6831-14-158
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li Hongxing, Thomas List, Ing-Marie Nilsson, Anders Johansson, Anne Nordrehaug Astrøm

Abstract

To determine the impact of oral diseases on everyday life, measures of oral quality of life are needed. In complementing traditional disease-based measures, they assess the need for oral care to evaluate oral health care programs and management of treatment. To assess the reliability and validity of the Oral Impact of Daily Performance (OIDP) and the short-form Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) among high school students in Xi'an, the capital of Shanxi province, China.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 133 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 15%
Student > Bachelor 20 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Other 29 21%
Unknown 31 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Psychology 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Design 2 1%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 35 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2014.
All research outputs
#15,313,289
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from BMC Oral Health
#737
of 1,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,907
of 353,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Oral Health
#21
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,462 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.