You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Training finger individuation with a mechatronic-virtual reality system leads to improved fine motor control post-stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-11-171 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kelly O Thielbar, Thomas J Lord, Heidi C Fischer, Emily C Lazzaro, Kristin C Barth, Mary E Stoykov, Kristen M Triandafilou, Derek G Kamper |
| Abstract |
Dexterous manipulation of the hand, one of the features of human motor control, is often compromised after stroke, to the detriment of basic functions. Despite the importance of independent movement of the digits to activities of daily living, relatively few studies have assessed the impact of specifically targeting individuated movements of the digits on hand rehabilitation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of such finger individuation training, by means of a novel mechatronic-virtual reality system, on fine motor control after stroke. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 350 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 66 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 9% |
| Researcher | 28 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 4% |
| Other | 53 | 15% |
| Unknown | 108 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 62 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 12% |
| Engineering | 39 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 23 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 52 | 15% |
| Unknown | 119 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2016.
All research outputs
#5,532,102
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#315
of 1,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,824
of 352,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#10
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,989 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.