↓ Skip to main content

A core outcome set for clinical trials on non-specific low back pain: study protocol for the development of a core domain set

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
129 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A core outcome set for clinical trials on non-specific low back pain: study protocol for the development of a core domain set
Published in
Trials, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-511
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alessandro Chiarotto, Caroline B Terwee, Richard A Deyo, Maarten Boers, Chung-Wei Christine Lin, Rachelle Buchbinder, Terry P Corbin, Leonardo OP Costa, Nadine E Foster, Margreth Grotle, Bart W Koes, Francisco M Kovacs, Chris G Maher, Adam M Pearson, Wilco C Peul, Mark L Schoene, Dennis C Turk, Maurits W van Tulder, Raymond W Ostelo

Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most disabling and costly disorders affecting modern society, and approximately 90% of patients are labelled as having non-specific LBP (NSLBP). Several interventions for patients with NSLBP have been assessed in clinical trials, but heterogeneous reporting of outcomes in these trials has hindered comparison of results and performance of meta-analyses. Moreover, there is a risk of selective outcome reporting bias. To address these issues, the development of a core outcome set (COS) that should be measured in all clinical trials for a specific health condition has been recommended. A standardized set of outcomes for LBP was proposed in 1998, however, with evolution in COS development methodology, new instruments, interventions, and understanding of measurement properties, it is appropriate to update that proposal. This protocol describes the methods used in the initial step in developing a COS for NSLBP, namely, establishing a core domain set that should be measured in all clinical trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 124 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 16%
Researcher 12 9%
Professor 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 27 21%
Unknown 26 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 15%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Sports and Recreations 4 3%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 32 25%