You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Correction to: Adenosine stress CMR T1-mapping detects early microvascular dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without obstructive coronary artery disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-017-0406-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eylem Levelt, Stefan K. Piechnik, Alexander Liu, Rohan S. Wijesurendra, Masliza Mahmod, Rina Ariga, Jane M. Francis, Andreas Greiser, Kieran Clarke, Stefan Neubauer, Vanessa M. Ferreira, Theodoros D. Karamitsos |
| Abstract |
In the original publication of this article [1] Fig. 1 was incorrect due to the use of a colour bar with wrong range in error. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 58% |
| Other | 2 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 67% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2017.
All research outputs
#20,219,839
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,165
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,078
of 448,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#34
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.