↓ Skip to main content

Severity score for hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Severity score for hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13023-014-0188-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giuseppe A Latino, Helen Kim, Jeffrey Nelson, Ludmila Pawlikowska, William Young, Marie E Faughnan, the Brain Vascular Malformation Consortium HHT Investigator Group

Abstract

A disease severity score in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) would be a useful tool for assessing burden of disease and for designing clinical trials. Here, we propose the first known HHT severity score, the HHT-score. Demographics and disease characteristics were collected for the first 525 HHT patients recruited to the HHT Project of the Brain Vascular Malformation Consortium (BVMC). HHT-score was calculated based on presence of: organ arteriovenous malformations (maximum 3 points); chronic bleeding (maximum 2 points); and severe organ involvement (maximum 2 points). Points were summed and patients categorized as having mild (0-2), moderate (3-4) or severe (5-7) disease. The occurrence of "any adverse outcome" was evaluated for association with HHT-score categories. The frequency of "any adverse outcome" was significantly different across the three groups (49.6% in mild, 65.8% in moderate and 89.5% in severe, p<0.001). Adjusting for age and gender, the risk of "any adverse outcome" was higher in the moderate (OR=1.84, 95% CI: 1.15-2.95, p=0.011) and severe groups (OR=9.16, 95% CI: 1.99-42.09, p=0.004) compared to the mild. We have taken the first steps toward creating a global measure of disease severity in HHT. While the initial results are promising, further validation of the HHT-score is still required.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 21%
Other 3 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2014.
All research outputs
#6,725,888
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#919
of 2,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,029
of 353,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#21
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.