↓ Skip to main content

Predictors of poor blood pressure control among Iranian hypertensive patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predictors of poor blood pressure control among Iranian hypertensive patients
Published in
BMC Research Notes, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13104-017-2971-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leila Jahangiry, Jalileh Ghanbari, Mahdieh Abbasalizad Farhangi, Parvin Sarbakhsh, Koen Ponnet

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate factors associated with poor blood pressure (BP) control in older hypertensive patients living in Iran. Poorly controlled hypertension was defined as blood pressure greater than or equal to 140/90 mmHg. Multiple logistic regressions were performed to identify factors associated with poor BP control. More than half of the patients (55.1%) had poor control of hypertension. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that being over 60 years of age (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.18-2.37; p = .003), being widowed or divorced (OR 1.56; 95% CI 1.03-2.35; p = .035], smoking (OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.07-2.65; p = .01], BMI > 25 kg/m2 (OR 1.51 95% CI 1.05-2.78), having a waist circumference ≥ 90 cm (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.2-2.42; p = .003], the use of calcium channel blockers (OR 2.69; 95% CI 1.26-5.72; p = .01], and the use of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (OR 1.66; 95% CI 1.01-2.72; p = .044] contributed significantly to poor control of hypertension. Making a key BP control screening target (such as age over 60 and waist circumference of 90 cm or more) for cardiovascular specialists and other health care practitioners is needed for elderly patients at risk for poor BP control.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 17 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 22%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 17 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2018.
All research outputs
#20,454,971
of 23,011,300 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#3,580
of 4,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#374,467
of 439,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#153
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,011,300 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.