You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Simplifying cardiovascular magnetic resonance pulse sequence terminology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-014-0103-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthias G Friedrich, Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci, James A White, Sven Plein, James C Moon, Ana G Almeida, Christopher M Kramer, Stefan Neubauer, Dudley J Pennell, Steffen E Petersen, Raymond Y Kwong, Victor A Ferrari, Jeanette Schulz-Menger, Hajime Sakuma, Erik B Schelbert, Éric Larose, Ingo Eitel, Iacopo Carbone, Andrew J Taylor, Alistair Young, Albert de Roos, Eike Nagel |
| Abstract |
We propose a set of simplified terms to describe applied Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) pulse sequence techniques in clinical reports, scientific articles and societal guidelines or recommendations. Rather than using various technical details in clinical reports, the description of the technical approach should be based on the purpose of the pulse sequence. In scientific papers or other technical work, this should be followed by a more detailed description of the pulse sequence and settings. The use of a unified set of widely understood terms would facilitate the communication between referring physicians and CMR readers by increasing the clarity of CMR reports and thus improve overall patient care. Applied in research articles, its use would facilitate non-expert readers' understanding of the methodology used and its clinical meaning. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 9% |
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| Spain | 2 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 23% |
| Scientists | 3 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Qatar | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 17% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 13 | 25% |
| Unknown | 5 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 54% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2015.
All research outputs
#2,487,027
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#111
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,783
of 361,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#2
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.