You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Does health intervention research have real world policy and practice impacts: testing a new impact assessment tool
|
---|---|
Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/1478-4505-13-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gillian Cohen, Jacqueline Schroeder, Robyn Newson, Lesley King, Lucie Rychetnik, Andrew J Milat, Adrian E Bauman, Sally Redman, Simon Chapman |
Abstract |
There is a growing emphasis on the importance of research having demonstrable public benefit. Measurements of the impacts of research are therefore needed. We applied a modified impact assessment process that builds on best practice to 5 years (2003-2007) of intervention research funded by Australia's National Health and Medical Research Council to determine if these studies had post-research real-world policy and practice impacts. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 7 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 6 | 17% |
Canada | 4 | 11% |
United States | 2 | 6% |
Curaçao | 1 | 3% |
Chile | 1 | 3% |
Greece | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 13 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 19 | 54% |
Scientists | 10 | 29% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 11% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 112 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 24 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 16% |
Student > Master | 18 | 15% |
Other | 11 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 7% |
Other | 23 | 19% |
Unknown | 16 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 24 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 9% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 8% |
Other | 31 | 26% |
Unknown | 24 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2020.
All research outputs
#893,428
of 25,311,095 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#67
of 1,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,561
of 365,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,311,095 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.