You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cost effective interventions for the prevention of cardiovascular disease in low and middle income countries: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-285 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amir Shroufi, Rajiv Chowdhury, Raghupathy Anchala, Sarah Stevens, Patricia Blanco, Tha Han, Louis Niessen, Oscar H Franco |
| Abstract |
While there is good evidence to show that behavioural and lifestyle interventions can reduce cardiovascular disease risk factors in affluent settings, less evidence exists in lower income settings.This study systematically assesses the evidence on cost-effectiveness for preventive cardiovascular interventions in low and middle-income settings. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Cameroon | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 149 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 21% |
| Researcher | 23 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 21% |
| Unknown | 29 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 10% |
| Psychology | 10 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 23 | 15% |
| Unknown | 32 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#18,800,225
of 23,299,593 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#13,130
of 15,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,744
of 199,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#260
of 296 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,299,593 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 296 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.