↓ Skip to main content

Effects of a multi-strain probiotic supplement for 12 weeks in circulating endotoxin levels and cardiometabolic profiles of medication naïve T2DM patients: a randomized clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of a multi-strain probiotic supplement for 12 weeks in circulating endotoxin levels and cardiometabolic profiles of medication naïve T2DM patients: a randomized clinical trial
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12967-017-1354-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shaun Sabico, Ayah Al-Mashharawi, Nasser M. Al-Daghri, Sobhy Yakout, Abdullah M. Alnaami, Majed S. Alokail, Philip G. McTernan

Abstract

The present randomized clinical trial characterized the beneficial effects of a multi-strain probiotics supplementation on improving circulating endotoxin levels (primary endpoint) and other cardiometabolic biomarkers (secondary endpoint) in patients with T2DM. A total of 78 adult Saudi T2DM patients (naïve and without co-morbidities) participated in this clinical trial and were randomized to receive twice daily placebo or probiotics [(2.5 × 109 cfu/g) containing the following bacterial strains: Bifidobacterium bifidum W23, Bifidobacterium lactis W52, Lactobacillus acidophilus W37, Lactobacillus brevis W63, Lactobacillus casei W56, Lactobacillus salivarius W24, Lactococcus lactis W19 and Lactococcus lactis W58 (Ecologic®Barrier)] in a double-blind manner for 12 weeks. Anthropometrics and cardiometabolic profiles were obtained at baseline and after 12/13 weeks of treatment. After 12/13 weeks of intervention and using intention-to-treat analysis, no difference was noted in endotoxin levels between groups [Placebo - 9.5% vs. Probiotics - 52.2%; (CI - 0.05 to 0.36; p = 0.15)]. Compared with the placebo group however, participants in the probiotics groups had a significant but modest improvement in WHR [Placebo 0.0% vs. Probiotics 1.11%; (CI - 0.12 to - 0.01; p = 0.02)] as well as a clinically significant improvement in HOMA-IR [Placebo - 12.2% vs. Probiotics - 60.4%; (CI - 0.34 to - 0.01; p = 0.04)]. Using a multi-strain probiotic supplement daily for 12/13 weeks significantly improved HOMA-IR and modestly reduced abdominal adiposity among medication naïve T2DM patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01765517 , Registered January 10, 2013.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 212 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 32 15%
Student > Master 29 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 8%
Researcher 15 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 78 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 12 6%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 87 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,485,026
of 23,011,300 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#1,238
of 4,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,197
of 439,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#19
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,011,300 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.