↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of models to predict recruitment to multicentre clinical trials

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic review of models to predict recruitment to multicentre clinical trials
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, July 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-10-63
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katharine D Barnard, Louise Dent, Andrew Cook

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 8%
United Kingdom 3 4%
Japan 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 69 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Master 9 11%
Other 7 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Other 17 21%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 30%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 11%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Mathematics 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Other 18 23%
Unknown 11 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,199,777
of 23,482,849 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,067
of 2,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,473
of 96,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,482,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.