↓ Skip to main content

Correlates of psychological functioning of homeless youth in Accra, Ghana: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Mental Health Systems, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correlates of psychological functioning of homeless youth in Accra, Ghana: a cross-sectional study
Published in
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/1752-4458-9-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kwaku Oppong Asante, Anna Meyer-Weitz, Inge Petersen

Abstract

Research on homeless youth has shown that this population is at high risk for various mental health problems. Previous studies conducted among homeless young adults in Ghana have focused primarily on economic, social and cultural causes of homelessness, their engagement in risky sexual behaviours and the prevalence of STI including HIV/AIDS. We are therefore not fully informed of the prevalence of psychological symptoms and their associated factors. The aim of the study was to determine the association between psychological functioning and social and health risk behaviours among a sample of homeless youth in Ghana.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Namibia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 249 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 19%
Researcher 23 9%
Student > Bachelor 22 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 8%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 79 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 53 21%
Social Sciences 37 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 10%
Arts and Humanities 5 2%
Other 18 7%
Unknown 80 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,450,249
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#416
of 718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,652
of 352,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#12
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.