You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A randomized longitudinal dietary intervention study during pregnancy: effects on fish intake, phospholipids, and body composition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-14-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marja Bosaeus, Aysha Hussain, Therese Karlsson, Louise Andersson, Lena Hulthén, Cecilia Svelander, Ann-Sofie Sandberg, Ingrid Larsson, Lars Ellegård, Agneta Holmäng |
| Abstract |
Fish and meat intake may affect gestational weight gain, body composition and serum fatty acids. We aimed to determine whether a longitudinal dietary intervention during pregnancy could increase fish intake, affect serum phospholipid fatty acids, gestational weight gain and body composition changes during pregnancy in women of normal weight participating in the Pregnancy Obesity Nutrition and Child Health study. A second aim was to study possible effects in early pregnancy of fish intake and meat intake, respectively, on serum phospholipid fatty acids, gestational weight gain, and body composition changes during pregnancy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 33% |
| India | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 141 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 13% |
| Researcher | 17 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 12% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 38 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 49 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2015.
All research outputs
#13,344,161
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#1,020
of 1,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,374
of 352,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#29
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.