You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Fifth German Oral Health Study (Fünfte Deutsche Mundgesundheitsstudie, DMS V) – rationale, design, and methods
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Oral Health, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6831-14-161 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rainer A Jordan, Constanze Bodechtel, Katrin Hertrampf, Thomas Hoffmann, Thomas Kocher, Ina Nitschke, Ulrich Schiffner, Helmut Stark, Stefan Zimmer, Wolfgang Micheelis, the DMS V Surveillance Investigators’ Group |
| Abstract |
Oral diseases rank among the most prevalent non-communicable diseases in modern societies. In Germany, oral epidemiological data show that both dental caries and periodontal diseases are highly prevalent, though significant improvements in oral health has been taking in the population within the last decades, particularly in children. It is, therefore, the aim of the Fifth German Oral Health Study (DMS V) to actualize the data on current oral health status and to gather information on oral health behavior and risk factors. In addition to current oral health monitoring, the study will also permit conclusions about trends in the development of oral health in Germany between 1989 and 2014. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 172 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 12% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Researcher | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 37 | 22% |
| Unknown | 53 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 49% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 58 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,151,655
of 23,197,711 outputs
Outputs from BMC Oral Health
#84
of 1,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,369
of 355,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Oral Health
#1
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,197,711 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,521 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.