↓ Skip to main content

A penalized linear mixed model for genomic prediction using pedigree structures

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Proceedings, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A penalized linear mixed model for genomic prediction using pedigree structures
Published in
BMC Proceedings, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1753-6561-8-s1-s67
Pubmed ID
Authors

Can Yang, Cong Li, Mengjie Chen, Xiaowei Chen, Lin Hou, Hongyu Zhao

Abstract

Genetic Analysis Workshop 18 provided a platform for evaluating genomic prediction power based on single-nucleotide polymorphisms from single-nucleotide polymorphism array data and sequencing data. Also, Genetic Analysis Workshop 18 provided a diverse pedigree structure to be explored in prediction. In this study, we attempted to combine pedigree information with single-nucleotide polymorphism data to predict systolic blood pressure. Our results suggested that the prediction power based on pedigree information only could be unsatisfactory. Using additional information such as single-nucleotide polymorphism genotypes would improve prediction accuracy. In particular, the improvement can be significant when there exist a few single-nucleotide polymorphisms with relatively larger effect sizes. We also compared the prediction performance based on genome-wide association study data (ie, common variants) and sequencing data (ie, common variants plus low-frequency variants). The experimental result showed that inclusion of low frequency variants could not lead to improvement of prediction accuracy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 8%
Unknown 11 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Student > Master 2 17%
Professor 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 33%
Computer Science 2 17%
Unspecified 1 8%
Mathematics 1 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2015.
All research outputs
#18,388,295
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from BMC Proceedings
#265
of 374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,828
of 228,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Proceedings
#9
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 374 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.