↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of score card-based antenatal risk selection, care pathways, and multidisciplinary consultation in the Healthy Pregnancy 4 All study (HP4ALL): study protocol for a cluster randomized…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of score card-based antenatal risk selection, care pathways, and multidisciplinary consultation in the Healthy Pregnancy 4 All study (HP4ALL): study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-16-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amber A Vos, Sabine F van Voorst, Adja JM Waelput, Lieke C de Jong-Potjer, Gouke J Bonsel, Eric AP Steegers, Semiha Denktaş

Abstract

Promotion of healthy pregnancies has gained high priority in the Netherlands because of relatively unfavorable perinatal outcomes. In response, a nationwide study, 'Healthy Pregnancy 4 All' (HP4ALL), has been initiated. Part of this study involves systematic and broadened antenatal risk assessment (the Risk Assessment substudy). Risk selection in current clinical practice is mainly based on medical risk factors. Despite the increasing evidence for the influence of nonmedical risk factors (social status, lifestyle or ethnicity) on perinatal outcomes, these risk factors remain highly unexposed. Systematic risk selection, combined with customized care pathways to reduce or treat detected risks, and regular and structured consultation between community midwives, gynecologists and other care providers such as social workers, is part of this study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 129 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Researcher 11 8%
Other 8 6%
Other 30 23%
Unknown 34 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 23%
Psychology 9 7%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 37 28%