↓ Skip to main content

Advancing inclusive science and systemic change: the convergence of national aims and institutional goals in implementing and assessing biomedical science training

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Proceedings, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Advancing inclusive science and systemic change: the convergence of national aims and institutional goals in implementing and assessing biomedical science training
Published in
BMC Proceedings, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12919-017-0086-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sylvia Hurtado, Damani White-Lewis, Keith Norris

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 16%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Master 7 10%
Other 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 24 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 10 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Psychology 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 28 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2017.
All research outputs
#15,485,255
of 23,011,300 outputs
Outputs from BMC Proceedings
#211
of 374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,423
of 439,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Proceedings
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,011,300 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 374 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.