↓ Skip to main content

Derivation and validation phase for the development of clinical prediction rules for rehabilitation in chronic nonspecific low back pain patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Derivation and validation phase for the development of clinical prediction rules for rehabilitation in chronic nonspecific low back pain patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-16-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lenie Denteneer, Gaetane Stassijns, Willem De Hertogh, Steven Truijen, Nienke Jansen, Ulrike Van Daele

Abstract

There is a consensus that exercise therapy should be used as a therapeutic approach in chronic low back pain (CLBP) but little consensus has been reached about the preferential type of therapy. Due to the heterogeneity of the population no clear effect of specific therapy interventions are found. Probably a specific subgroup of the investigated population will benefit from the intervention and another subgroup will not benefit, looking at the total investigated population no significant effects can be found. Therefore there is a need for the development of clinical prediction rules (CPRs). Objectives for this trial are first, the derivation of CPRs to predict treatment response to three forms of exercise therapy for patients with nonspecific CLBP. Secondly, we aim to validate a CPR for the three forms of exercise therapy for patients with nonspecific CLBP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 183 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 15%
Student > Bachelor 26 14%
Researcher 20 11%
Student > Postgraduate 15 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 8%
Other 36 20%
Unknown 45 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 18%
Sports and Recreations 8 4%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 60 33%