You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy and intracorporeal neobladder formation: on the way to a standardized procedure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgical Oncology, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7819-13-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christian Schwentner, Allen Sim, Mevlana Derya Balbay, Tilman Todenhöfer, Stefan Aufderklamm, Omar Halalsheh, Johannes Mischinger, Johannes Böttge, Steffen Rausch, Simone Bier, Arnulf Stenzl, Georgios Gakis, Abdullah Erdem Canda |
| Abstract |
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with intracorporeal diversion has been shown to be feasible in a few centers of excellence worldwide, with promising functional and oncologic outcomes. However, it remains unknown whether the complexity of the procedure allows its duplication in other non-pioneer centers. We attempt to address this issue by presenting our cumulative experience with RARC and intracorporeal neobladder formation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 34 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 51% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2015.
All research outputs
#2,647,557
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#42
of 2,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,942
of 352,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgical Oncology
#2
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,042 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.