↓ Skip to main content

“You can’t just jump on a bike and go”: a qualitative study exploring parents’ perceptions of physical activity in children with type 1 diabetes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“You can’t just jump on a bike and go”: a qualitative study exploring parents’ perceptions of physical activity in children with type 1 diabetes
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12887-014-0313-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen Quirk, Holly Blake, Beatrice Dee, Cris Glazebrook

Abstract

BackgroundParents of children with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) have an important role in supporting diabetes management behaviours and helping to maintain their child¿s healthy lifestyle. Physical activity has known benefits for children with T1DM [1], but children with chronic health conditions typically have low levels of physical activity. Research is needed to build an understanding of the experience of physical activity for children with T1DM. The purpose of this study was to understand parent¿s perceptions of what influences physical activity for children with T1DM and to inform the practice of those working with children who have T1DM.MethodsData were collected through semi-structured interviews with 20 parents (18 mothers, 2 fathers) who had a child aged 7 ¿ 13 years with T1DM in the UK. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and data were analysed using thematic analysis [2]).ResultsFactors believed to influence participation in physical activity are presented as 7 major themes and 15 subthemes. Themes that emerged included the conflict between planning and spontaneous activity, struggles to control blood glucose, recognition of the importance of physical activity, the determination of parents, children relying on their parents to manage physical activity, the importance of a good support system and individual factors about the children that influence physical activity participation.ConclusionsThis study highlights that parents serve as gate-keepers for children¿s physical activity. The findings provide insight into the need for T1DM knowledge and competence in personnel involved in the supervision of children¿s physical activities. Healthcare providers should collaborate with families to ensure understanding of how to manage physical activity. The findings sensitise professionals to the issues confronted by children with T1DM and their parents, as well as the methods used by children and their families to overcome obstacles to physical activity. The implications for further research, clinical practice, and physical activity promotion with children with T1DM are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 127 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 20%
Student > Bachelor 21 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Researcher 12 9%
Other 8 6%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 29 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 14%
Psychology 13 10%
Sports and Recreations 12 9%
Social Sciences 9 7%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 33 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2016.
All research outputs
#4,249,339
of 23,316,003 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#793
of 3,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,484
of 355,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,316,003 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,086 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.