↓ Skip to main content

Constraint-induced movement therapy: trial sequential analysis applied to Cochrane collaboration systematic review results

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Constraint-induced movement therapy: trial sequential analysis applied to Cochrane collaboration systematic review results
Published in
Trials, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-512
Pubmed ID
Authors

Greta Castellini, Silvia Gianola, Rita Banzi, Davide Corbetta, Roberto Gatti, Valeria Sirtori, Christian Gluud, Lorenzo Moja

Abstract

Trial sequential analysis (TSA) may establish when firm evidence about the efficacy of interventions is reached in a cumulative meta-analysis, combining a required information size with adjusted thresholds for conservative statistical significance. Our aim was to demonstrate TSA results on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included in a Cochrane systematic review on the effectiveness of constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) for stroke patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 98 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 17%
Researcher 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Master 11 11%
Other 6 6%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 25 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 18%
Neuroscience 11 11%
Psychology 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 29 29%