↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic echocardiography in an unstable intensive care patient

Overview of attention for article published in Echo Research & Practice, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnostic echocardiography in an unstable intensive care patient
Published in
Echo Research & Practice, March 2015
DOI 10.1530/erp-14-0040
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Gray, F. Baldwin, S. Bruemmer-Smith

Abstract

A previously fit and well 57-year-old gentleman who had recently undergone a colonoscopy and biopsy of a polyp presented with a 4-day history of progressive breathlessness and abdominal discomfort. The day after admission, he became haemodynamically unstable, developed ischaemic legs and suffered a brief cardiac arrest. Blood tests demonstrated a coagulopathy and hypoglycaemia. Continued haemodynamic instability post-arrest and clinical findings of high right-sided heart pressures were investigated by bedside screening echocardiogram. This demonstrated a massive pericardial effusion causing tamponade of the right ventricle. Heavily blood stained pericardial fluid was drained, with marked improvement in haemodynamic stability. Retrospective review of the admission-electrocardiogram (ECG) and chest X-ray demonstrated electrical alternans and cardiac enlargement. The differential diagnosis included bowel malignancy causing a haemorrhagic metastatic pericardial effusion and a type A aortic dissection. Therefore a computerised tomography (CT) scan of chest, abdomen, pelvis and aorta was performed. This was negative for disseminated malignancy and showed a type B aortic dissection, but was inconclusive for a type A aortic dissection. A subsequent transoesophageal echocardiogram confirmed the diagnosis of type B dissection and ruled out a type A dissection. The histology of the colonic polyp was negative for malignancy, but it was subsequently discovered that the patient had metastatic adenocarcinoma from a primary lung cancer diagnosed from pleural fluid cytology. With hindsight the presenting clinical picture was of type B aortic dissection with concurrent but not directly related pericardial tamponade. Basic echocardiography skills are increasingly being used acutely by physicians' as part of resuscitative care in intensive care unit (ICU) patients.The availability of expert skills in transoesophageal echocardiography are essential in ICU, as demonstrated in this case, where it was needed for discriminating between sub types of aortic dissection.Cardiac tamponade is a clinical diagnosis, although the presence of electrical alternans on an ECG with associated tachycardia is highly suggestive of cardiac tamponade.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 22%
Other 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Librarian 2 9%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 87%
Unspecified 1 4%
Unknown 2 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2017.
All research outputs
#2,381,001
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Echo Research & Practice
#61
of 268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,087
of 270,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Echo Research & Practice
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.