You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Research with pregnant women: a call to action
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reproductive Health, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12978-017-0419-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Margaret Olivia Little, Marisha N. Wickremsinhe |
| Abstract |
Despite a global need for the use of medication during pregnancy, the medical research community lacks robust evidence for safety and efficacy of treatments and preventives often taken by pregnant women. Given the biological differences between pregnant women and the rest of the population, the need to gather data on the ways in which medications behave in the pregnant body is critical to the health of pregnant women and their offspring. Three ethical reasons are central to this need: 1. Pregnant women deserve access to effective treatment, 2. Pregnant women deserve access to safe treatment, and 3. Pregnant women deserve equitable access to trials carrying the prospect of direct benefit. In this paper, we introduce and frame this Supplement Issue, which presents important conference proceedings of the 2016 Global Forum on Bioethics in Research meeting held in Buenos Aires, Argentina, on the 3rd and 4th of November. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 105 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 30 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 21 | 20% |
| Canada | 7 | 7% |
| Ireland | 4 | 4% |
| Australia | 4 | 4% |
| Malawi | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 28 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 65 | 62% |
| Scientists | 23 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 15% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 19 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 10% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 292. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2020.
All research outputs
#118,801
of 25,270,999 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#9
of 1,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,660
of 452,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#1
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,270,999 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.