↓ Skip to main content

A cluster analysis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in dusty areas cohort identified three subgroups

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A cluster analysis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in dusty areas cohort identified three subgroups
Published in
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12890-017-0553-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suhyun Kim, Myoung-Nam Lim, Yoonki Hong, Seon-Sook Han, Seung-Joon Lee, Woo Jin Kim

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a heterogeneous disease with variable clinical manifestations, structural changes, and treatment responses. In a cohort study, we performed a baseline cluster analysis to identify the subgroups of COPD and to assess the clinical outcomes of each subgroup during a 1-year follow-up. We analyzed dusty areas cohort comprising 272 patients with COPD. The main factors with the highest loading in 15 variables were selected using principal component analysis (PCA) at baseline. The COPD patients were classified by hierarchical cluster analysis using clinical, physiological, and imaging data based on PCA-transformed data. The clinical parameters and outcomes during the 1-year follow-up were evaluated among the subgroups. PCA revealed that six independent components accounted for 77.3% of variance. Three distinct subgroups were identified through the cluster analysis. Subgroup 1 included younger subjects with fewer symptoms and mild airflow obstruction, and they had fewer exacerbations during the 1-year follow-up. Subgroup 2 comprised subjects with additional symptoms and moderate airflow obstruction, and they most frequently experienced exacerbations requiring hospitalization during the 1-year follow-up. Subgroup 3 included subjects with additional symptoms and mild airflow obstruction; this group had more female patients and a modest frequency of exacerbations requiring hospitalization. Cluster analysis using the baseline data of a COPD cohort identified three distinct subgroups with different clinical parameters and outcomes. These findings suggest that the identified subgroups represent clinically meaningful subtypes of COPD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 26%
Researcher 9 24%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 10 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 10 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2017.
All research outputs
#18,579,736
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#1,406
of 1,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#328,012
of 440,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#71
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.