↓ Skip to main content

Modifying the Rizzoli foot model to improve the diagnosis of pes‐planus: application to kinematics of feet in teenagers

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modifying the Rizzoli foot model to improve the diagnosis of pes‐planus: application to kinematics of feet in teenagers
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13047-014-0057-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicola Portinaro, Alberto Leardini, Artemisia Panou, Valerio Monzani, Paolo Caravaggi

Abstract

A number of multi-segment foot protocols have been proposed to obtain measurements of clinical value. In the clinical assessment of foot pathologies and deformities, such as in the pes-planus, the frontal-plane alignment of the calcaneus and the dynamic properties of the medial longitudinal arch are critical parameters though often neglected by the majority of foot protocols. The aim of the present work is to modify an established foot protocol to obtain static and kinematic measures more consistent with corresponding clinical observations. Moreover, while many papers have reported kinematic data from varying populations, few investigations have focussed on young participants from same-age cohorts.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 164 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 16%
Student > Master 24 14%
Researcher 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 39 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 22%
Engineering 29 17%
Sports and Recreations 22 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 47 28%