↓ Skip to main content

Development of a self-administered questionnaire to screen patients for cervical myelopathy

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of a self-administered questionnaire to screen patients for cervical myelopathy
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-11-268
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hiroshi Kobayashi, Shin-ichi Kikuchi, Koji Otani, Miho Sekiguchi, Yasufumi Sekiguchi, Shin-ichi Konno

Abstract

In primary care, it is often difficult to diagnose cervical myelopathy. However, a delay in treatment could cause irreversible aftereffects. With a brief and effective self-administered questionnaire for cervical myelopathy, cervical myelopathy may be screened more easily and oversight may be avoided. As there is presently no screening tool for cervical myelopathy, the aim of this study was to develop a self-administered questionnaire for the screening of cervical myelopathy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 4 3%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 121 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 46%
Other 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 6%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Researcher 6 5%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 10 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 16%
Physics and Astronomy 9 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 14 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2015.
All research outputs
#16,323,841
of 25,010,497 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,465
of 4,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,001
of 191,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#12
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,010,497 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,353 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.