You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A comparative analysis of swallowing accelerometry and sounds during saliva swallows
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-925x-14-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joshua M Dudik, Iva Jestrović, Bo Luan, James L Coyle, Ervin Sejdić |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 64 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 12 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 19 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 9% |
| Psychology | 4 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2016.
All research outputs
#13,419,571
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#338
of 824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,130
of 352,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#10
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 824 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.