Title |
Effectiveness of a computerized drug-monitoring program to detect and prevent adverse drug events and medication non-adherence in outpatient ambulatory care: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Trials, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-16-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alan J Forster, Tobias E Erlanger, Alison Jennings, Claudine Auger, David Buckeridge, Carl van Walraven, Robyn Tamblyn |
Abstract |
Medications are an effective intervention for managing and preventing health problems but their benefit can be undermined by non-adherence or adverse drug events (ADEs). Since these issues may be interconnected, efforts to improve non-adherence should also include reduction of ADEs. We have developed the ISTOP-ADE system (Information Systems-enabled Outreach for Preventing Adverse Drug Events), which enables timely monitoring and managing of ADEs. The objectives of this study are to determine whether the ISTOP-ADE system, compared to routine care, will reduce: a) the probability of discontinuing the use of prognosis-altering medications; b) the probability of a patient experiencing a severe ADE; c) the proportion of patients experiencing ADEs, preventable ADEs and ameliorable ADEs; and d) health services utilization.Methods/design: We will randomly assign 2,200 adult ambulatory patients in the province of Quebec who have been prescribed an incident medication for the management or prevention of a chronic health condition, to routine care or the ISTOP-ADE system. The ISTOP-ADE system consists of an interactive voice response system (IVRS) paired with pharmacist support. The IVRS will call patients at 3 and 17 days post-prescription to determine if they are experiencing any problems and connect them with a pharmacist when required or desired by the patient. We will evaluate medication persistence at 180 days and health-care utilization using provincial administrative data. Two blinded physicians will ascertain ADE status through a case review. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 145 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 24 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 15% |
Researcher | 17 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
Other | 8 | 5% |
Other | 27 | 18% |
Unknown | 37 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 17% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 23 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
Other | 21 | 14% |
Unknown | 48 | 33% |