↓ Skip to main content

Mapping genetic variations to three-dimensional protein structures to enhance variant interpretation: a proposed framework

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
34 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mapping genetic variations to three-dimensional protein structures to enhance variant interpretation: a proposed framework
Published in
Genome Medicine, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13073-017-0509-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gustavo Glusman, Peter W. Rose, Andreas Prlić, Jennifer Dougherty, José M. Duarte, Andrew S. Hoffman, Geoffrey J. Barton, Emøke Bendixen, Timothy Bergquist, Christian Bock, Elizabeth Brunk, Marija Buljan, Stephen K. Burley, Binghuang Cai, Hannah Carter, JianJiong Gao, Adam Godzik, Michael Heuer, Michael Hicks, Thomas Hrabe, Rachel Karchin, Julia Koehler Leman, Lydie Lane, David L. Masica, Sean D. Mooney, John Moult, Gilbert S. Omenn, Frances Pearl, Vikas Pejaver, Sheila M. Reynolds, Ariel Rokem, Torsten Schwede, Sicheng Song, Hagen Tilgner, Yana Valasatava, Yang Zhang, Eric W. Deutsch

Abstract

The translation of personal genomics to precision medicine depends on the accurate interpretation of the multitude of genetic variants observed for each individual. However, even when genetic variants are predicted to modify a protein, their functional implications may be unclear. Many diseases are caused by genetic variants affecting important protein features, such as enzyme active sites or interaction interfaces. The scientific community has catalogued millions of genetic variants in genomic databases and thousands of protein structures in the Protein Data Bank. Mapping mutations onto three-dimensional (3D) structures enables atomic-level analyses of protein positions that may be important for the stability or formation of interactions; these may explain the effect of mutations and in some cases even open a path for targeted drug development. To accelerate progress in the integration of these data types, we held a two-day Gene Variation to 3D (GVto3D) workshop to report on the latest advances and to discuss unmet needs. The overarching goal of the workshop was to address the question: what can be done together as a community to advance the integration of genetic variants and 3D protein structures that could not be done by a single investigator or laboratory? Here we describe the workshop outcomes, review the state of the field, and propose the development of a framework with which to promote progress in this arena. The framework will include a set of standard formats, common ontologies, a common application programming interface to enable interoperation of the resources, and a Tool Registry to make it easy to find and apply the tools to specific analysis problems. Interoperability will enable integration of diverse data sources and tools and collaborative development of variant effect prediction methods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 141 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 16%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 31 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 50 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 16%
Computer Science 8 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 3%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 36 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,498,851
of 25,611,630 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#320
of 1,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,325
of 447,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#12
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,611,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.