You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A repeated measures, randomised cross-over trial, comparing the acute exercise response between passive and active sitting in critically ill patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Anesthesiology, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2253-15-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nikki Collings, Rebecca Cusack |
| Abstract |
Early mobilisation of critically ill patients is safe and beneficial, but the metabolic cost of exercise remains unquantified. This study compared the acute exercise response in critically ill participants during passive and active sitting. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 81 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 27 | 33% |
| United States | 5 | 6% |
| Chile | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 35 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 58 | 72% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 15% |
| Scientists | 10 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 157 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
| Researcher | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 32 | 20% |
| Unknown | 42 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 24% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 55 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2021.
All research outputs
#788,922
of 25,713,737 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#11
of 1,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,013
of 362,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,713,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,720 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.