↓ Skip to main content

Tick-borne haemoparasites in African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) from two wildlife areas in Northern Botswana

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tick-borne haemoparasites in African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) from two wildlife areas in Northern Botswana
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13071-014-0627-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dewald Eygelaar, Ferran Jori, Mokganedi Mokopasetso, Kgomotso P Sibeko, Nicola E Collins, Ilse Vorster, Milana Troskie, Marinda C Oosthuizen

Abstract

BackgroundThe African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) is a host for many pathogens known to cause economically important diseases and is often considered an important reservoir for livestock diseases. Theileriosis, heartwater, babesiosis and anaplasmosis are considered the most important tick-borne diseases of livestock in sub-Saharan Africa, resulting in extensive economic losses to livestock farmers in endemic areas. Information on the distribution of tick-borne diseases and ticks is scarce in Northern Botswana. Nevertheless, this data is necessary for targeting surveillance and control measures in livestock production at national level.MethodsIn order to address this gap, we analyzed 120 blood samples from buffalo herds for the presence of common tick-borne haemoparasites causing disease in livestock, collected in two of the main wildlife areas of Northern Botswana: the Chobe National Park (CNP, n¿=¿64) and the Okavango Delta (OD, n¿=¿56).ResultsAnalysis of the reverse line blot (RLB) hybridization assay results revealed the presence of Theileria, Babesia, Anaplasma and Ehrlichia species, either as single or mixed infections. Among the Theileria spp. present, T. parva (60%) and T. mutans (37%) were the most prevalent. Other species of interest were Anaplasma marginale subsp. centrale (30%), A. marginale (20%), Babesia occultans (23%) and Ehrlichia ruminantium (6%). The indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) indicated 74% of samples to be positive for the presence of T. parva antibodies. Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) detected the highest level of animals infected with T. parva (81% of the samples). The level of agreement between the tests for detection of T. parva positive animals was higher between qPCR and IFAT (kappa¿=¿0.56), than between qPCR and RLB (kappa¿=¿0.26) or the latter and IFAT (kappa¿=¿0.15).ConclusionsThis is the first report of tick-borne haemoparasites in African buffalo from northern Botswana, where animals from the CNP showed higher levels of infection than those from OD. Considering the absence of fences separating wildlife and livestock in the CNP and the higher levels of some parasite species in buffalo from that area, surveillance of tick-borne diseases in livestock at the interface in the CNP should be prioritized.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 139 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 18%
Researcher 24 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 5%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 37 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 30%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 30 20%
Environmental Science 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 40 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2015.
All research outputs
#12,910,051
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#2,186
of 5,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,673
of 379,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#54
of 164 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 164 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.