↓ Skip to main content

Establishing core outcome sets for phenylketonuria (PKU) and medium-chain Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency in children: study protocol for systematic reviews and Delphi surveys

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Establishing core outcome sets for phenylketonuria (PKU) and medium-chain Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency in children: study protocol for systematic reviews and Delphi surveys
Published in
Trials, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13063-017-2327-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beth K. Potter, Brian Hutton, Tammy J. Clifford, Nicole Pallone, Maureen Smith, Sylvia Stockler, Pranesh Chakraborty, Pauline Barbeau, Chantelle M. Garritty, Michael Pugliese, Alvi Rahman, Becky Skidmore, Laure Tessier, Kylie Tingley, Doug Coyle, Cheryl R. Greenberg, Lawrence Korngut, Alex MacKenzie, John J. Mitchell, Stuart Nicholls, Martin Offringa, Andreas Schulze, Monica Taljaard, In collaboration with the Canadian Inherited Metabolic Diseases Research Network

Abstract

Inherited metabolic diseases (IMD) are a large group of rare single-gene disorders that are typically diagnosed early in life. There are important evidence gaps related to the comparative effectiveness of therapies for IMD, which are in part due to challenges in conducting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for rare diseases. Registry-based RCTs present a unique opportunity to address these challenges provided the registries implement standardized collection of outcomes that are important to patients and their caregivers and to clinical providers and healthcare systems. Currently there is no core outcome set (COS) for studies evaluating interventions for paediatric IMD. This protocol outlines a study that will establish COS for each of two relatively common IMD in children, phenylketonuria (PKU) and medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (MCAD) deficiency. This two-part study is registered with the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative. Part 1 includes a rapid review and development of an evidence map to identify a comprehensive listing of outcomes reported in past studies of PKU and MCAD deficiency. The review follows established methods for knowledge synthesis, including a comprehensive search strategy, two stages of screening citations against inclusion/exclusion criteria by two reviewers working independently, and extraction of important data elements from eligible studies, including details of the outcomes collected and outcome measurement instruments. The review findings will inform part 2 of our study, a set of Delphi surveys to establish consensus on the highest priority outcomes for each condition. Healthcare providers, families of children with PKU or MCAD deficiency, and health system decision-makers will be invited to participate in two to three rounds of Delphi surveys. The design of the surveys will involve parents of children with IMD who are part of a family advisory forum. This protocol is a crucial step in developing the capacity to launch RCTs with meaningful outcomes that address comparative effectiveness questions in the field of paediatric IMD. Such trials will contribute high-quality evidence to inform decision-making by patients and their family members, clinicians, and policy-makers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 32 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 30 34%