↓ Skip to main content

Chitosan-based scaffold modified with D-(+) raffinose for cartilage repair: an in vivo study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chitosan-based scaffold modified with D-(+) raffinose for cartilage repair: an in vivo study
Published in
Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12952-014-0021-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesca Ravanetti, Carlo Galli, Edoardo Manfredi, Anna Maria Cantoni, Edoardo Scarpa, Guido Maria Macaluso, Antonio Cacchioli

Abstract

BackgroundOsteochondral defects significantly affect patients¿ quality of life and represent challenging tissue lesions, because of the poor regenerative capacity of cartilage. Tissue engineering has long sought to promote cartilage repair, by employing artificial scaffolds to enhance cell capacity to deposit new cartilage. An ideal biomaterial should closely mimic the natural environment of the tissue, to promote scaffold colonization, cell differentiation and the maintenance of a differentiated cellular phenotype. The present study evaluated chitosan scaffolds enriched with D-(+) raffinose in osteochondral defects in rabbits. Cartilage defects were created in distal femurs, both on the condyle and on the trochlea, and were left untreated or received a chitosan scaffold. The animals were sacrificed after 2 or 4 weeks, and samples were analysed microscopically.ResultsThe retrieved implants were surrounded by a fibrous capsule and contained a noticeable inflammatory infiltrate. No hyaline cartilage was formed in the defects. Although defect closure reached approximately 100% in the control group after 4 weeks, defects did not completely heal when filled with chitosan. In these samples, the lesion contained granulation tissue at 2 weeks, which was then replaced by fibrous connective tissue by week 4. Noteworthy, chitosan never appeared to be integrated in the surrounding cartilage.ConclusionsIn conclusion, the present study highlights the limits of D-(+) raffinose-enriched chitosan for cartilage regeneration and offers useful information for further development of this material for tissue repair.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 18%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Master 6 13%
Other 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Engineering 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Materials Science 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 11 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2015.
All research outputs
#20,249,662
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine
#102
of 112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#296,773
of 353,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.